Sequences and iteration

There are a number of motivations for this post. One stems from my extensive exposure to Clojure over the past few years: this was, and still is, my primary programming language for everyday work. Soon, I realized that much of the power of Clojure comes from a sequence abstraction being one of its central concepts, and a standard library that contains many sequence-manipulating functions. It turns out that by combining them it is possible to solve a wide range of problems in a concise, high-level way. In contrast, it pays to think in terms of whole sequences, rather than individual elements.

This is a slightly edited translation of an article I first published on my Polish blog on January 19, 2011. It is meant to target newcomers to Clojure and show how to use Clojure to solve a simple real-life problems.

I’ve recently been developing an iPhone application in my spare time. I’m not going to tell you what it is just yet (I will post a separate entry once I manage to get it into the App Store); for now, let me just say that I’m writing it in JavaScript and HTML5, using [PhoneGap][1] and [jQTouch][2] to give it a native touch.

I keep running into this obstacle every now and then. Consider this example:

> q = []
[]
> for (var i = 0; i < 3; i++)
    q.push(function() { console.log(i); });
> q[0]()
3

I wanted an array of three closures, each printing a different number to the console when called. Instead, each prints 3 (or, rather, whatever the value of the variable i happens to be).

It is practically impossible to teach good programming to students that have had a prior exposure to BASIC: as potential programmers they are mentally mutilated beyond hope of regeneration.

— Edsger W. Dijkstra, EWD 498

I’ve been quiet on the front of blogging in English recently. But that doesn’t mean I’ve given up.

After more than a year, I had become tired of maintaining a Blosxom installation. I greatly admire Blosxom, its minimalism and extensibility, but the default installation is just too minimal for my needs. And the plugins tend to have rough edges. Like the Disqus comments that I’ve enabled at one time on the otherwise static blog pages: the correct number of comments appears in some places but not all; besides, they just don’t feel right.

I’ve decided to move my English blog to Posterous. The new address is http://danieljanus-en.posterous.com. This URL (http://blog.danieljanus.pl) will point to the new blog in about a week’s time.

I’m only posting this to let people update their RSS feeds to the new address, which is

There’s been an ongoing debate about how to pass optional named arguments to Clojure functions. One way to do this is the defnk macro from clojure.contrib.def; I hesitate to call it canonical, since apparently not everyone uses it, but I’ve found it useful a number of times. Here’s a sample:

The program I’ve been [writing about recently][1] has come to a point where I think it can be shown to the wide public. It’s called [Sunflower][2] and has its home on GitHub. It’s nowhere near being completed, and of alpha quality right now, but even at this stage it might be useful.

Clojure by default protects macro authors from incidentally capturing a local symbol. Stuart Halloway describes this in more detail, explaining why this is a Good Thing. However, sometimes this kind of symbol capture is called for. I’ve encountered one such case today while hacking a Swing application.